Ad
related to: leash law sonoma county superior court- Court Case Records
Get Info On Any Public Court Case
Reveal Incriminating Details Today!
- Public Court Records
See Public Public Court Records
Millions Of Citizens. Search Today!
- Criminal Court Records
See If Anyone Has Been To Court
Browse Up To Date Court Records
- County Court Records
Easily Search Court Records Online
Just Enter A Name & Choose A State
- State Court Record Search
Search Our Database For Court Info
Answer Your Burning Questions Now!
- Court Criminal Check
Court Records, Millions Of Citizens
Available In Our Database. Search
- Court Case Records
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Sonoma County Hall of Justice was built between 1963 and 1965 to a design by J. Clarence Felciano & Associates. [10] For much of its history, the judiciary of Sonoma County was divided into two primary court systems- the Municipal Court and the Superior Court. The two courts would merge and be reorganized as a single Superior Court in 1996.
Dog regulations are enforced by the Whatcom County Animal Control officers. Repeated violations are designated as civil infractions. Violators of the leash law can be ticketed and fined up to $250.
Another quirk is that because the superior courts are now fully unified with all courts of inferior jurisdiction, the superior courts must hear relatively minor cases that previously would have been heard in such inferior courts, such as infractions, misdemeanors, "limited civil" actions (actions where the amount in controversy is below $35,000), and "small claims" actions.
Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County, 450 U.S. 464 (1981), was a United States Supreme Court case over the issue of gender bias in statutory rape laws. The petitioner argued that the statutory rape law discriminated based on gender and was unconstitutional.
Superior Court of Alpine County No. 6429. [17] The case was transferred to Alpine Superior Court; DWP filed a cross-complaint seeking adjudication of Basin water rights to all appropriators, naming 117 cross-defendants, including the plaintiffs, the State, United States Forest Service, U.S Bureau of Land Management, and other private water ...
Burnham v. Superior Court of California, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case addressing whether a state court may, consistent with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, exercise personal jurisdiction over a non-resident of the state who is served with process while temporarily visiting the state.
The People of the State of California v. Superior Court (Romero), 13 CAL. 4TH 497, 917 P.2D 628 (Cal. 1996), was a landmark case in the state of California that gave California Superior Court judges the ability to dismiss a criminal defendant's "strike prior" pursuant to the California Three-strikes law, thereby avoiding a 25-to-life minimum sentence.
Mexicali Rose v. Superior Court, 1 Cal. 4th 617 (1992), was a Supreme Court of California case in which the court’s decision held that restaurants, grocery stores, and other food service establishments in California can be held liable for injuries sustained by patrons from foreign objects—including natural food parts—that are left in food ...