Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A federal judge said Kraft Heinz must face a proposed nationwide class action alleging that it defrauded consumers by claiming its Kraft macaroni and cheese, one of its best-known products ...
Kraft Heinz to face consumers in court over claim its mac and cheese has additives: Judge Kraft Heinz will have to go to court after a federal judge did not dismiss a class action lawsuit alleging ...
Amanda Ramirez, of Hialeah, has filed a proposed $5 million class action lawsuit against Kraft Heinz Foods Company alleging the food producer’s Velveeta Shells & Cheese takes longer than ...
On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom in Miami dismissed Amanda Ramirez's proposed $5 million class action lawsuit from last November against Kraft Heinz Co. in which she alleged it falsely advertised that its Velveeta Shells & Cheese cups are "ready in 3 1/2 minutes."
In a decision on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Mary Rowland said the Illinois, California and New York consumers leading the lawsuit plausibly alleged that Kraft Mac & Cheese contained a ...
A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit accusing Kraft Heinz & Co of misleading consumers by promising it takes only 3-1/2 minutes to prepare a cup of microwavable Velveeta macaroni...
Kraft Heinz to face class-action lawsuit over mac & cheese labeling, Chicago judge rules According to court documents, the macaroni and cheese products are labeled, marketed, and sold with a label ...
On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom in Miami dismissed Amanda Ramirez's proposed $5 million class action lawsuit from last November against Kraft Heinz Co. in which she alleged it falsely advertised that its Velveeta Shells & Cheese cups are "ready in 3 1/2 minutes."
A Florida judge dismissed the lawsuit filed by Amanda Ramirez against Kraft Heinz over what she claims is deceptive and fraudulent packaging on its Velveeta Shells & Cheese.
Plaintiff Amanda Ramirez filed a Response in Opposition, ECF No. [19], to which Defendant filed a Reply, ECF No. [20]. The Court scheduled a hearing on the Motion, see ECF No. [24], and heard oral argument on July 11, 2023, ECF No. [27].