Ads
related to: six unfair labor practices california code
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
An unfair labor practice (ULP) in United States labor law refers to certain actions taken by employers or unions that violate the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (49 Stat. 449) 29 U.S.C. § 151–169 (also known as the NLRA and the Wagner Act after NY Senator Robert F. Wagner [1]) and other legislation.
SEIU 721 said it had lodged more than 20 "unfair labor practice" charges over faulty language in the agreements and other alleged violations such as using contractors to perform the jobs of union ...
The California court set aside the injunction, but still granted an award of damages. [3] It said this was based on tort for unfair labor practices under the Civil Code. [4] The case was granted certiorari again to decide if the California court had jurisdiction to award damages arising out of peaceful union activity which it could not enjoin.
A federal court found in July 2014 that the ALRB committed an “en masse segregation of voters” to intimidate the workers from de-certifying the UFW, [disputed – discuss] and that ALRB's regional director deliberately “delayed completion of his investigation” of alleged fraud and unfair labor practices in order to prevent a count of the workers’ ballots.
The union filed an unfair labor practice claim with the City of Los Angeles Employee Relations Board over this issue, along with previous claims filed over several other issues. ... In Northern ...
The strike threats prompted UC leaders to file their own state unfair labor practice charge against the union on Friday that called on the state's labor board to order student workers to "cease ...
The California Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB) administers the Act. The ALRB has two functions: To conduct, oversee, and certify representation elections, and to investigate unfair labor practice (ULP) charges and pursue remedies. [4]
The Employee Free Choice Act would have amended the National Labor Relations Act in three significant ways. That is: section 2 would have eliminated the need for an additional ballot to require an employer recognize a union, if a majority of workers have already signed cards expressing their wish to have a union