Ads
related to: online square root simplifier calc 2 problemsstudy.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
amazon.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A method analogous to piece-wise linear approximation but using only arithmetic instead of algebraic equations, uses the multiplication tables in reverse: the square root of a number between 1 and 100 is between 1 and 10, so if we know 25 is a perfect square (5 × 5), and 36 is a perfect square (6 × 6), then the square root of a number greater than or equal to 25 but less than 36, begins with ...
In the case of two nested square roots, the following theorem completely solves the problem of denesting. [2]If a and c are rational numbers and c is not the square of a rational number, there are two rational numbers x and y such that + = if and only if is the square of a rational number d.
Tonelli–Shanks cannot be used for composite moduli: finding square roots modulo composite numbers is a computational problem equivalent to integer factorization. [1] An equivalent, but slightly more redundant version of this algorithm was developed by Alberto Tonelli [2] [3] in 1891.
Newton's method is one of many known methods of computing square roots. Given a positive number a, the problem of finding a number x such that x 2 = a is equivalent to finding a root of the function f(x) = x 2 − a. The Newton iteration defined by this function is given by
The square root of a positive integer is the product of the roots of its prime factors, because the square root of a product is the product of the square roots of the factors. Since p 2 k = p k , {\textstyle {\sqrt {p^{2k}}}=p^{k},} only roots of those primes having an odd power in the factorization are necessary.
Technically, it should be called the principal square root of 2, to distinguish it from the negative number with the same property. Geometrically, the square root of 2 is the length of a diagonal across a square with sides of one unit of length; this follows from the Pythagorean theorem. It was probably the first number known to be irrational. [1]
If x is a simple root of the polynomial (), then Laguerre's method converges cubically whenever the initial guess, (), is close enough to the root . On the other hand, when x 1 {\displaystyle x_{1}} is a multiple root convergence is merely linear, with the penalty of calculating values for the polynomial and its first and second derivatives at ...
Since the secant method can carry out twice as many steps in the same time as Steffensen's method, [b] in practical use the secant method actually converges faster than Steffensen's method, when both algorithms succeed: The secant method achieves a factor of about (1.6) 2 ≈ 2.6 times as many digits for every two steps (two function ...