Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In particular, if one uses dynamic resizing with exact doubling and halving of the table size, then the hash function needs to be uniform only when the size is a power of two. Here the index can be computed as some range of bits of the hash function. On the other hand, some hashing algorithms prefer to have the size be a prime number. [19]
A standard technique is to use a modulo function on the key, by selecting a divisor M which is a prime number close to the table size, so h(K) ≡ K (mod M). The table size is usually a power of 2. This gives a distribution from {0, M − 1}. This gives good results over a large number of key sets.
In the programming language C++, unordered associative containers are a group of class templates in the C++ Standard Library that implement hash table variants. Being templates , they can be used to store arbitrary elements, such as integers or custom classes.
Let h(k) be a hash function that maps an element k to an integer in [0, m−1], where m is the size of the table. Let the i th probe position for a value k be given by the function (,) = + + where c 2 ≠ 0 (If c 2 = 0, then h(k,i) degrades to a linear probe
A perfect hash function can, as any hash function, be used to implement hash tables, with the advantage that no collision resolution has to be implemented. In addition, if the keys are not in the data and if it is known that queried keys will be valid, then the keys do not need to be stored in the lookup table, saving space.
hash HAS-160: 160 bits hash HAVAL: 128 to 256 bits hash JH: 224 to 512 bits hash LSH [19] 256 to 512 bits wide-pipe Merkle–Damgård construction: MD2: 128 bits hash MD4: 128 bits hash MD5: 128 bits Merkle–Damgård construction: MD6: up to 512 bits Merkle tree NLFSR (it is also a keyed hash function) RadioGatún: arbitrary ideal mangling ...
Fowler–Noll–Vo (or FNV) is a non-cryptographic hash function created by Glenn Fowler, Landon Curt Noll, and Kiem-Phong Vo.. The basis of the FNV hash algorithm was taken from an idea sent as reviewer comments to the IEEE POSIX P1003.2 committee by Glenn Fowler and Phong Vo in 1991.
Setting this threshold close to zero and using a high growth rate for the table size leads to faster hash table operations but greater memory usage than threshold values close to one and low growth rates. A common choice would be to double the table size when the load factor would exceed 1/2, causing the load factor to stay between 1/4 and 1/2. [5]