Ad
related to: use circular in a sentence format to make
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A circular definition is a type of definition that uses the term(s) being defined as part of the description or assumes that the term(s) being described are already known. There are several kinds of circular definition, and several ways of characterising the term: pragmatic , lexicographic and linguistic .
"File 13" is a euphemism for the trash can.The phrase is especially used in the U.S. military, and is less common outside of the United States.In the United Kingdom, for instance, the expression "round file" or "circular file" is more common (in reference to trash cans typically being round).
Fallacies of definition are the various ways in which definitions can fail to explain terms. The phrase is used to suggest an analogy with an informal fallacy. [1] Definitions may fail to have merit, because they are overly broad, [2] [3] [4] overly narrow, [3] [4] or incomprehensible; [4] or they use obscure or ambiguous language, [2] contain mutually exclusive parts, [3] or (perhaps most ...
circular definition] Template documentation. Usage. This is an inline template for marking a circular definition, defining a term as itself ("a tree is a tree"). See ...
Although they are written with a space, they're best thought of as single words. No consistent distinction in meaning or use can be found between them. Like the reflexive pronouns, their use is limited to contexts where an antecedent precedes it. In the case of the reciprocals, they need to appear in the same clause as the antecedent. [1]
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
A circular reference is not to be confused with the logical fallacy of a circular argument.Although a circular reference will often be unhelpful and reveal no information, such as two entries in a book index referring to each other, it is not necessarily so that a circular reference is of no use.
Use this tag if an inline citation to a source is given, and you suspect that the source is quoting material first published in Wikipedia. If that is the case, this is a situation of circular reporting or " citogenesis ", and the cited sentence can not be verified from the source.