When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Case or Controversy Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_or_Controversy_Clause

    The Supreme Court of the United States has interpreted the Case or Controversy Clause of Article III of the United States Constitution (found in Art. III, Section 2, Clause 1) as embodying two distinct limitations on exercise of judicial review: a bar on the issuance of advisory opinions, and a requirement that parties must have standing.

  3. TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TransUnion_LLC_v._Ramirez

    TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413 (2021), was a United States Court case dealing with standing under Article III of the Constitution related to class-action suits against private defendants. In a 5–4 decision, the Court ruled that only those that can show concrete harm have standing to seek damages against private defendants.

  4. Article Three of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the...

    The Supreme Court has interpreted this provision as enabling Congress to create inferior (i.e., lower) courts under both Article III, Section 1, and Article I, Section 8. The Article III courts, which are also known as "constitutional courts", were first created by the Judiciary Act of 1789, and are the only courts with judicial power.

  5. Troxel v. Granville - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troxel_v._Granville

    Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States, citing a constitutional right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children, struck down a Washington law that allowed any third party to petition state courts for child visitation rights over parental objections.

  6. National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institute_of...

    National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, 585 U.S. 755 (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States addressing the constitutionality of California's FACT Act, which mandated that crisis pregnancy centers provide certain disclosures about state services.

  7. Cramer v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramer_v._United_States

    Cramer appealed his conviction to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, where his conviction was upheld. [10] Appealing to the court of last resort, the Supreme Court, Cramer was granted certiorari on November 8, 1943. [11] The case was originally argued on March 9, 1944; [12] reargued on November 6, 1944; and finally decided on April 23 ...

  8. Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fry_v._Napoleon_Community...

    Fry v. Napoleon Community Schools, 580 U.S. 154 (2017), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Handicapped Children's Protection Act of 1986 does not command exhaustion of state-level administrative remedies codified in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) when the gravamen of the plaintiff's lawsuit is not related to the denial of free ...

  9. Baby M - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_M

    On February 3, 1988, the Supreme Court of New Jersey, led by Chief Justice Robert Wilentz, invalidated surrogacy contracts as against public policy but in dicta affirmed the trial court's use of a "best interest of the child" analysis and remanded the case to family court. The Court held the contract to be unenforceable and restored Whitehead's ...