Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986) Set the standard for what parties must establish in evidence to be granted summary judgement in federal civil cases and how courts should evaluate those motions. Since such motions are extremely common, Anderson has become the most-cited Supreme Court case. Daubert v.
Law Enforcement officers stand at the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on July 11, 2022 in Washington, DC. Activists with NextGen America placed chrysanthemums in front of the U.S. Supreme Court to ...
United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation, 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001), was a landmark American antitrust law case at the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
US federal courts have jurisdiction over an action initiated by an American company, against an American citizen infringing on that company's trademark rights, if the citizen's operations and their effects are not confined within the territorial limits of a foreign country. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood: 369 U.S. 469: April 30, 1962: 7–0 Procedural
The business world has a lot at stake this year in cases before the Supreme Court that could limit the power of social media, federal agencies and US bankruptcy courts. The business world has a ...
The Supreme Court is weighing new boundaries for corporate America as its term ends in the coming weeks. Justices for the highest US court have already rejected an appeal from payday lenders to ...
Hughes Court (February 24, 1930 – June 30, 1941) Stone Court (July 3, 1941 – April 22, 1946) Vinson Court (June 24, 1946 – September 8, 1953) Warren Court (October 5, 1953 – June 23, 1969) Burger Court (June 23, 1969 – September 26, 1986) Rehnquist Court (September 26, 1986 – September 3, 2005) Roberts Court (September 29, 2005 ...
Federal courts of appeals lack jurisdiction to hear untimely filed appeals Pfizer, Inc. v. Government of India: 434 U.S. 308 (1978) Foreign nations, who may sue in federal court, may also obtain triple damages for violations of the Clayton Act: Bordenkircher v. Hayes: 434 U.S. 357 (1978)