Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The term pseudohistory was coined in the early nineteenth century, which makes the word older than the related terms pseudo-scholarship and pseudoscience. [4] In an attestation from 1815, it is used to refer to the Contest of Homer and Hesiod, a purportedly historical narrative describing an entirely fictional contest between the Greek poets Homer and Hesiod. [5]
Rowan Gavin Paton Menzies (14 August 1937 – 12 April 2020) [1] [2] [3] was a British submarine lieutenant-commander who authored books claiming that the Chinese sailed to America before Columbus.
The history of pseudoscience is the study of pseudoscientific theories over time. A pseudoscience is a set of ideas that presents itself as science, while it does not meet the criteria to properly be called such. [1] [2] Distinguishing between proper science and pseudoscience is sometimes difficult.
Pseudo-scholarship (from pseudo-and scholarship) is a term used to describe work (e.g., publication, lecture) or a body of work that is presented as, but is not, the product of rigorous and objective study or research; the act of producing such work; or the pretended learning upon which it is based.
[16] [17] In this sense, there is some overlap with other dismissive labels, such as pseudoarchaeology, [6] [18] pseudohistory, [6] and pseudoscience. [ 19 ] [ 20 ] Describing ideas as fringe theories may be less pejorative than describing them as pseudoscholarship ; [ 21 ] while it is unlikely that anyone would identify their own work as ...
Fringe science theories are often advanced by people who have no traditional academic science background, or by researchers outside the mainstream discipline. [ 2 ] : 58 [ 3 ] The general public has difficulty distinguishing between science and its imitators, [ 2 ] : 173 and in some cases, a "yearning to believe or a generalized suspicion of ...
Fantastic archaeology" was used during the 1980s as the name of an undergraduate course at Harvard University taught by Stephen Williams, who published a book with the same title. [9] During the 2000s, the term "alternative archaeology" began to be instead applied by academics like Tim Sebastion (2001), [ 10 ] Robert J. Wallis (2003), [ 11 ...
Most scholars and reviewers label Butler and Knight's work as pseudoscience. Aubrey Burl, a much-published digger of Megalithic sites and a lecturer in archaeology at Hull College of Higher Education, although he coauthored a book with Thom, [21] derided Thom's work, saying that he himself had never "seen a Megalithic Yard". Jason Colavito, in ...