When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: south carolina patent lawsuits for sale

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucas_v._South_Carolina...

    Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the "total takings" test for evaluating whether a particular regulatory action constitutes a regulatory taking that requires compensation. [1]

  3. List of United States Supreme Court patent case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    The Court found contributory infringement for the sale of the defendant's ink with patent owner's machine (inherency doctrine). Westinghouse Elec. & Mfg. Co, v. Wagner Elec. & Mfg. Co. 225 U.S. 604: 1912: Bauer & Cie. v. O'Donnell: 229 U.S. 1: 1913: Patent right does not include right to dictate the price of the product. The Fair v. Kohler Die ...

  4. List of United States patent law cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Multiple lawsuits over several patents relating to MP3 encoding and compression technologies. Ariad v. Lilly - 2006. Broad infringement case related to a ubiquitous transcription factor. EBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. - Supreme Court, 2006. Ruled that an injunction should not automatically issue based on a finding of patent infringement.

  5. Intel is being targeted by patent trolls. We need to know who ...

    www.aol.com/intel-being-targeted-patent-trolls...

    In Intel’s case, the company has faced repeated patent infringement lawsuits from VLSI Technology, a subsidiary of Fortress Investment Group, which is owned by a sovereign investor in the United ...

  6. Apple wins $250 US jury verdict in patent case over Masimo ...

    www.aol.com/news/masimo-smartwatches-infringe...

    The jury, in Delaware, agreed with Apple that previous iterations of Masimo's W1 and Freedom watches and chargers willfully violated Apple's patent rights in smartwatch designs.

  7. US Supreme Court won't review Apple's win against $503 ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-wont-review...

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear patent-licensing company VirnetX's bid to revive a $502.8 million jury verdict it won against Apple in a dispute over internet-security patents.