Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Merriam-Webster defines patriotism as "love for or devotion to one’s country", whereas nationalism is defined as "loyalty and devotion to a nation". [definition needed] Today, nationalism has gained a more negative connotation. [4] [5] In contrast, patriotism is used to refer to genuine pride in one's nation, recognizing both its merits ...
The reasons for not wanting to use the work of others are varied, but can include a desire to support a local economy instead of paying royalties to a foreign license-holder, fear of patent infringement, lack of understanding of the foreign work, an unwillingness to acknowledge or value the work of others, jealousy, belief perseverance, or ...
But it is also sensible for strategic reasons. Free societies tend not to fight one another or to be bad neighbours". [200] The A Secure Europe in a Better World, European Security Strategy states: "The best protection for our security is a world of well-governed democratic states." [201] Tony Blair has also claimed the theory is correct. [202]
Loyalists vigorously attacked Common Sense; one attack, titled Plain Truth (1776), by Marylander James Chalmers, said Paine was a political quack [50] and warned that without monarchy, the government would "degenerate into democracy". [51] Even some American revolutionaries objected to Common Sense; late in life John Adams called it a ...
In "A Full Vindication of the Measures of the Congress", written in 1774, [7] Alexander Hamilton wrote: "All men have one common original, they participate in one common nature, and consequently have one common right. No reason can be assigned why one man should exercise any power over his fellow creatures more than another, unless they ...
The Trump converts said they trusted him more on the economy, even though all said they did not like him as a person. They said their personal financial situation had been better when he was ...
Thomas Paine's Common Sense for the first time expressed the belief that America was not just an extension of Europe but a new land and a country of nearly unlimited potential and opportunity that had outgrown the British mother country.
If communities function separately from each other, or compete with one another, they are not considered culturally pluralistic. [ 3 ] In 1971, the Canadian government referred to cultural pluralism, as opposed to multiculturalism, as the "very essence" of the nation's identity. [ 4 ]