Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
It was found that two-sided messages were more effective on budging educated men's opinions. [9] Additionally, two sided arguments were also better at generating change of opinion in those soldiers who opposed the argument initially. For less educated men who also supported the government's position, the one-sided argument was more persuasive. [3]
Dissoi Logoi, also called dialexeis, is a two-fold argument, which considers each side of an argument in hopes of coming to a deeper truth. [7] It is similar to a form of debate with oneself and holds that contradiction is an inevitable consequence of discourse .
Two-Sided Matching presents known material on its topics, rather than introducing new research, but it is not a textbook. Instead, its aim is to provide a survey of this area aimed at economic practitioners, with arguments for the importance of its material based on its pragmatic significance rather than its mathematical beauty.
Experts share 12 "I statements" to use in arguments at work and in your personal life. With some practice, they'll roll right off the tongue. ... Dr. Eshtehardi says that a good "I statement" has ...
Red herring – introducing a second argument in response to the first argument that is irrelevant and draws attention away from the original topic (e.g.: saying "If you want to complain about the dishes I leave in the sink, what about the dirty clothes you leave in the bathroom?"). [72] In jury trial, it is known as a Chewbacca defense.
Inoculation is a theory that explains how attitudes and beliefs can be made more resistant to future challenges. For an inoculation message to be successful, the recipient experiences threat (a recognition that a held attitude or belief is vulnerable to change) and is exposed to and/or engages in refutational processes (preemptive refutation, that is, defenses against potential counterarguments).
It seems like at least some of the items used as examples of persuasive definition are aspects of highly contentious two-sided arguments, but only provides the "definition" given by one side; this may suggest a degree of weight against that side if not balanced by something from the other, to show the presence of similar fallacy on both sides ...
Among Fox News guests in late 2013, this topic was presented in a contrarian way, with 31% of invited guests believing it was happening and 69% not. [1] False balance, known colloquially as bothsidesism, is a media bias in which journalists present an issue as being more balanced between opposing viewpoints than the evidence supports.