Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A similar theorem states that K 4 and K 2,3 are the forbidden minors for the set of outerplanar graphs. Although the Robertson–Seymour theorem extends these results to arbitrary minor-closed graph families, it is not a complete substitute for these results, because it does not provide an explicit description of the obstruction set for any family.
If a family F of graphs is closed under taking minors (every minor of a member of F is also in F), then by the Robertson–Seymour theorem F can be characterized as the graphs that do not have any minor in X, where X is a finite set of forbidden minors. [42]
A version of this theorem proved by Wagner (1937) states that if a graph G is both K 5-free and K 3,3-free, then G is planar. This theorem provides a "good reason" for a graph G not to have K 5 or K 3,3 as minors; specifically, G embeds on the sphere, whereas neither K 5 nor K 3,3 embed on the sphere.
Another result relating the four-color theorem to graph minors is the snark theorem announced by Robertson, Sanders, Seymour, and Thomas, a strengthening of the four-color theorem conjectured by W. T. Tutte and stating that any bridgeless 3-regular graph that requires four colors in an edge coloring must have the Petersen graph as a minor. [15]
In 1993, with Seymour and Robin Thomas, Robertson proved the -free case for which the Hadwiger conjecture relating graph coloring to graph minors is known to be true. [ 8 ] In 1996, Robertson, Seymour, Thomas, and Daniel P. Sanders published a new proof of the four color theorem , [ 9 ] confirming the Appel–Haken proof which until then had ...
Paul D. Seymour FRS (born 26 July 1950) is a British mathematician known for his work in discrete mathematics, especially graph theory.He (with others) was responsible for important progress on regular matroids and totally unimodular matrices, the four colour theorem, linkless embeddings, graph minors and structure, the perfect graph conjecture, the Hadwiger conjecture, claw-free graphs, χ ...
So, I would hesitate to call the Wagner's conjecture to be Robertson-Seymour theorem. Can anyone comment if this was really proved and if this theorem has been acknowledged as such by the mathematical community? --Drini 23:12, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC) Yes. The last paper for the Robertson-Seymour theorem was already published in 2004. Graph Minors. XX.
The proof of the strong perfect graph theorem by Chudnovsky et al. follows an outline conjectured in 2001 by Conforti, Cornuéjols, Robertson, Seymour, and Thomas, according to which every Berge graph either forms one of five types of basic building block (special classes of perfect graphs) or it has one of four different types of structural ...