Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
GARs typically remain open for at least one week. Anyone may close a GAR, although discussions which have become controversial should be left for closure by experienced users or GAR co-ordinators. If a clear consensus develops among participants that the issues have been resolved and the article meets GACR, the reassessment may be closed as ...
Editors should prioritize bringing an article up to standard above delisting. Reassessments are listed for discussion below and are concluded according to consensus. The GAR Coordinators — Lee Vilenski , Iazyges , Chipmunkdavis , and Trainsandotherthings — work to organize these efforts, as well as to resolve contentious reviews.
The Global Area Reference System (GARS) is a standardized geospatial reference system developed by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) for use across the United States Department of Defense.
The aim of the PRISMA statement is to help authors improve the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. [3] PRISMA has mainly focused on systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized trials, but it can also be used as a basis for reporting reviews of other types of research (e.g., diagnostic studies, observational studies).
Administering the test takes 10 minutes. [3] The scale is available in forms for teachers as well as parents, and like the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale it is comparatively less complicated to administer and score than other tests such as the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule or the Autism Diagnostic Interview — Revised (although both of ...
Gait Abnormality Rating Scale (GARS) [1] is a videotape-based analysis of 16 facets of human gait. It has been evaluated as a screening tool to identify patients at risk for injury from falls. [2] and has been used in remote gait evaluation. [3] A modified version was published in 1996. [4]
Positionality statements have also attracted controversy, being alternatively labeled by detractors as "research segregation", "positional piety", and "loyalty oaths". [ 11 ] [ 12 ] [ 13 ] According to critics, an author may claim moral authority through affinity with subjects, or through a confession of difference of relative privilege.
WP:3: Request comment (outside input in general) WP:RFC: Request dispute resolution (mediation when consensus hasn't been reached normally) WP:DRN: Request mediation (closed down – historical reference) WP:RFM: Request arbitration (enforceable action when all other venues have failed) WP:RFAR: See also: Involuntary mentorship (not the norm)