Ads
related to: reliable health information websites- What You Need to Know
Learn the Risk Factors of T1D.
Take the Type 1 Risk Quiz
- T1D Risk Factors
Take the Type 1 Risk Quiz to
Understand Your Risk for T1D
- Screen Early for T1D
Learn the Importance of
Screening Early
- Screen Early
Talk to Your Doctor About
Screening Early for T1D
- Plan For Your Future
Talk To A Doctor About T1D Symptoms
You or Your Loved One May Have
- Take the 1 Pledge
Take the Pledge to Screen
for Type 1 Diabetes. Learn More.
- What You Need to Know
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
While there are many excellent websites that provide reliable health and medical information, one of the best all-purpose sites that’s recommended by Consumer Reports for researching symptoms ...
While some writers have used terms like "reliable" [13] to describe Healthline, others have questioned both the quality of its content and its usability and readability. For example, the site Health News Review said a Healthline article about a new medication used promotional language copied from the drug-maker's press release, neglected to cite side effects, and framed the drug's claimed ...
But nonprofessional users could benefit from reliable health information in a layperson-accessible format. [ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ] The National Library of Medicine introduced MedlinePlus in October 1998, to provide a non-commercial online service similar, for example, to the commercial WebMD .
The WebMD website also includes information about drugs and is an important healthcare information website and the most popular consumer-oriented health site. [5] WebMD was started in 1998 by internet entrepreneur Jeff Arnold. [6] In early 1999, it was part of a three-way merger with Sapient Health Network (SHN) and Direct Medical Knowledge (DMK).
The purpose of the site was to provide reliable and easily accessed health information for the medical community including physicians, nurses, and medical students. The information published on the site is not meant to supersede medical training but to serve as a repository of medical review articles to give medical professionals an online ...
The popular press is generally not a reliable source for scientific and medical information in articles. Most medical news articles fail to discuss important issues such as evidence quality, [27] costs, and risks versus benefits, [28] and news articles too often convey wrong or misleading information about health care. [29]
An American websites with focus on "political bias" and "factual reporting". [222] [223].Metabunk: A discussion forum setup by Mick West that covers such topics as pseudoscience, UFOs and the paranormal. The website also includes a forum, "Skydentify", where West invites people to send photos and videos of UFOs and supposed ghosts. NPR Fact Check.
A 2014 study of 259 health professionals in Spain found that while 53% of them used the Spanish Wikipedia to look up medical information during work, only 3% of them considered it reliable and only 16% recommended it to their patients. Only 16% had ever edited a Wikipedia article; the most common reasons for not doing were that they did not ...