Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Academic writing often features prose register that is conventionally characterized by "evidence...that the writer(s) have been persistent, open-minded and disciplined in the study"; that prioritizes "reason over emotion or sensual perception"; and that imagines a reader who is "coolly rational, reading for information, and intending to formulate a reasoned response."
A book review that contains the judgment of the reviewer about the book is a primary source for the reviewer's opinion, and a secondary source for the contents of the book. [18] [19] A summary of the book within a review is a secondary source.
Most scientific and scholarly journals, and many academic and scholarly books, though not all, are based on some form of peer review or editorial refereeing to qualify texts for publication. Peer review quality and selectivity standards vary greatly from journal to journal, publisher to publisher, and field to field.
In scholarly writing, the objective of classifying sources is to determine the independence and reliability of sources. [5] Though the terms primary source and secondary source originated in historiography [citation needed] as a way to trace the history of historical ideas, they have been applied to many other fields. For example, these ideas ...
a book written 150 years later that analyzes the proclamation, an academic journal article written two years ago that examines the diary, and; an encyclopedia entry written last year, based on both the book and the journal. Both the proclamation and the diary are primary sources. These primary sources have advantages: they were written at the ...
Secondary sources comprise review articles that summarize the results of published studies to underscore progress and new research directions, as well as books that tackle extensive projects or comprehensive arguments, including article compilations. Tertiary sources encompass encyclopedias and similar works designed for widespread public ...
This is saying two things: one, that primary vs. secondary as it applies to books and media articles is less a matter of what the sources are than how they are used; and two, that the distinction has to do with context and cultural factors, as anything written in the 1930s about slavery -- even a scholarly source that is doing some ...
A self-published source by an expert may become an authoritative reference for a claim, as with the best-selling self-published book The Joy of Cooking as a source for claims about cooking techniques. A self-published source by an expert may include a significant opinion that hasn’t yet appeared in a non-self-published source.