When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: textus receptus vs alexandrian manuscripts 1 16

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Alexandrian text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandrian_text-type

    When compared to witnesses of the Byzantine text type, Alexandrian manuscripts tend: to have a larger number of abrupt readings, such as the shorter ending of the Gospel of Mark, which finishes in the Alexandrian text at Mark 16:8 (".. for they were afraid.") omitting verses Mark 16:9-20; Matthew 16:2b–3, John 5:4; John 7:53-8:11;

  3. Textual criticism of the New Testament - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism_of_the...

    Karl Lachmann became the first scholar to publish a critical edition of the Greek New Testament (1831) that was not simply based on the Textus Receptus anymore, but sought to reconstruct the original biblical text following scientific principles. [16] Starting with Lachmann, manuscripts of the Alexandrian text-type have been the most ...

  4. Textus Receptus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textus_Receptus

    Revelation 1:8 The Textus Receptus adds the words "the beginning and the ending". This phrase appears in: 2344, Codex Sinaiticus (4th century), Old Latin manuscripts, the Latin Vulgate (4th century), and 20 other Greek minuscules [130] All other witnesses to Revelation Metzger argued for the TR reading to be a harmonization from Revelation 21:6 ...

  5. Textual variants in the Acts of the Apostles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

    John Mill's 1707 Greek New Testament was estimated to contain some 30,000 variants in its accompanying textual apparatus [1] which was based on "nearly 100 [Greek] manuscripts." [ 2 ] Peter J. Gurry puts the number of non-spelling variants among New Testament manuscripts around 500,000, though he acknowledges his estimate is higher than all ...

  6. Textual variants in the Gospel of Mark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

    Byz: Stephanus Textus Receptus 1550, Scrivener's Textus Receptus 1894, RP Byzantine Majority Text 2005, Greek Orthodox Church [14]. Compare Matthew 3:11; John 1:26. [13] ἐν ὕδατι (in water) inserted after λέγων in Mark 1:7 – D it a it d it ff2 it r1 [13] Mark 1:8 π̣ν̣ι αγ̣[ιω] (the Holy Spirit) – 𝔓 137.

  7. Byzantine text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_text-type

    Codex Alexandrinus, the oldest Greek witness of the Byzantine text in the Gospels, close to the Family Π (Luke 12:54-13:4). The earliest clear notable patristic witnesses to the Byzantine text come from early eastern church fathers such as Gregory of Nyssa (335 – c. 395), John Chrysostom (347 – 407), Basil the Great (330 – 379) and Cyril of Jerusalem (313 – 386).

  8. Textual variants in the New Testament - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

    This running list of textual variants is nonexhaustive, and is continually being updated in accordance with the modern critical publications of the Greek New Testament — United Bible Societies' Fifth Revised Edition (UBS5) published in 2014, Novum Testamentum Graece: Nestle-Aland 28th Revised Edition of the Greek New Testament (NA28) published in 2012, and Novum Testamentum Graecum: Editio ...

  9. King James Only movement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Only_movement

    However, despite defending the Authorised Version and the Textus Receptus, both Burgon and Miller believed that although the Textus Receptus was to be preferred to the Alexandrian Text, it still required to be corrected in certain readings against the manuscript tradition of the Byzantine text (thus advocating the Byzantine priority theory). [12]