When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. How the 2000 Election Came Down to a Supreme Court Decision

    www.history.com/news/2000-election-bush-gore-votes-supreme-court

    As accusations of fraud and voter suppression, calls for recounts and the filing of lawsuits ensued, the terms “hanging chads,” “dimpled chads” and “pregnant chads” became part of the...

  3. The weeks-long battle over "hanging chads" that ultimately landed the fate of the presidency in the U.S. Supreme Court, continues to cast a long shadow over the nation's political psyche.

  4. Bush v. Gore - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore

    Palm Beach County changed standards for counting dimpled chads several times during the counting process; Broward County used less restrictive standards than Palm Beach County; Miami-Dade County's recount of rejected ballots did not include all precincts ;

  5. Hanging Chads: As the Florida Recount Implodes, the Supreme Court...

    www.usnews.com/news/articles/2008/01/17/the-legacy-of-hanging-chads

    News outlets carried images of Florida election officials staring at hanging, dimpled, and pregnant chads on Florida's punch-card ballots, trying to "discern the intent" of the voters.

  6. 2000 United States presidential election recount in Florida

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_United_States_presidential_election_recount_in_Florida

    From the beginning of the controversy, politicians, litigants and the press focused exclusively on the undervotes, in particular incompletely punched hanging chads. Undervotes (ballots that did not register any vote when counted by machine) were the subject of much media coverage, most of the lawsuits and the Florida Supreme Court ruling. [ 39 ]

  7. So, who really won? What the Bush v. Gore studies showed - CNN

    www.cnn.com/2015/10/31/politics/bush-gore-2000-election-results-studies

    CNN — After the grueling 36-day Florida recount battle, Al Gore finally conceded the presidency to George W. Bush on December 13, 2000. But the controversy surrounding this unprecedented election...

  8. Hanging by a Chad—or Not: The 2000 Presidential Election

    www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/essays/hanging-chad-or-not-2000...

    Florida’s votes now appeared to depend on manual recounts and the nature of the chads. Counting chads was complicated and controversial, but it was nothing compared to the legal battles about to break. Fearing the recounts might jeopardize Bush’s victory, his supporters sought to stop them through the courts.

  9. Bush v. Gore, legal case, decided on December 12, 2000, in which the Supreme Court of the United States reversed an order by the Florida Supreme Court for a selective manual recount of that state’s U.S. presidential election ballots.

  10. Bush v. Gore - Miller Center

    millercenter.org/contested-presidential-elections/bush-v-gore

    The national spectacle of the Florida recounts, with its disputed ballots, “hanging chads,” and determinative Supreme Court ruling, undermined Bush’s wish to start his presidency with a strongly united nation. While he won an Electoral College victory 271 to 266, Gore won 500,000 more popular votes from the American people than the victor.

  11. On this day, Bush v. Gore settles 2000 presidential race

    constitutioncenter.org/blog/on-this-day-bush-v-gore-anniversary

    On December 8, 2000, the Florida Supreme Court sided with Gore, ordering that all statewide “undervote” ballots, or punch-card ballots that had been cast but not registered because of a problem called a “hanging chad,” needed to be recounted.