Ad
related to: current controversies in medicine and medical science journal
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Sophie Jamal (Canada), former Professor of Medicine at University of Toronto and former staff endocrinologist at Women's College Hospital, Toronto, falsified data from studies of nitroglycerin compounds in osteoporosis. [87] Results published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in 2011 were retracted by the Journal in 2016 ...
Leibniz–Newton calculus controversy: Isaac Newton, Gottfried Leibniz; Proof of the Prime number theorem: Atle Selberg and/or Paul Erdős [2] [3] Proof of the Poincaré conjecture: Grigori Perelman or Shing-Tung Yau [4]
The company used this paper to promote paroxetine for teenagers. The ensuing controversy led to several lawsuits, including from the parents of teenagers who killed themselves while taking the drug, and intensified the debate about medical ghostwriting and conflict of interest in clinical trials. In 2012 the US Justice Department fined ...
This page was last edited on 21 February 2020, at 22:31 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
Participation of medical professionals in American executions; Linda Peeno; Pelvic examinations under anesthesia by medical students without consent; Pit of despair; Planned Parenthood 2015 undercover videos controversy; The Plutonium Files; Haleigh Poutre; Project Nightingale; Provo Canyon School; Purdue Pharma
Medical controversies (17 C, 95 P) N. ... Pages in category "Scientific controversies" ... Political interference with science agencies by the first Trump administration;
This leads the stance on certain scientific topics to be very different across the board as perceptions vary from person to person, this is the ultimate reason why scientific controversy exists, to begin with. Science-related controversies all follow similar characteristics. Conflict over personal beliefs, values, and interests; Public perception
The biopsychiatry controversy is a dispute over which viewpoint should predominate and form a basis of psychiatric theory and practice. The debate is a criticism of a claimed strict biological view of psychiatric thinking. Its critics include disparate groups such as the antipsychiatry movement and some academics.