Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
8 – Failed – Owner Occupied Dwellings – Tax Rate. 9 – Passed – Interest Rate – Judgments. 10 – Failed – Taxation – Rehabilitated Property. 11 – Failed – Taxation – County Owned Real Property. 12 – Failed – Constitutional Officers, Legislators and Judges Compensation. 13 – Passed – Property Tax Limitation.
The cases involved were all named Arizona v. California, and were decided in 1931, 1934, 1936, 1963, 1964, 1966, 1979, 1983, 1984, and 2000. The original decision, 283 U.S. 423 (1931), specified the amount of water to which Arizona was entitled under the Colorado River Compact of 1922.
Active service Chief Judge Senior status Appointed by Reason for termination — Leon Rene Yankwich: CA: 1888–1975 — — 1966–1975 [Note 1] F. Roosevelt/Operation of law: death — William Matthew Byrne Sr. CA: 1896–1974 — — 1966–1974 [Note 1] Truman/Operation of law: death 1 Peirson Mitchell Hall: CA: 1894–1979 1966–1968 ...
Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp., 439 U.S. 299 (1978) States may not cap the interest rates offered to their citizens by federally chartered banks based in other states; a holding that contributed greatly to the growth of the credit card industry in the ensuing decades. Garcia v.
"Abstract of judgment" is a written summary of a judgment which states how much money the losing defendant owes to the person who won the lawsuit (judgment creditor), the rate of interest to be paid on the judgment amount, court costs, and any specific orders that the losing defendant (judgment debtor) must obey, which abstract is acknowledged ...
As a result of the RICO conviction, Cauble forfeited his 31% interest in Cauble Enterprises, including two Cutter Bill Western World stores, three Texas banks (Western State Bank in Denton, Dallas International Bank and South Main Bank of Houston), six ranches, a welding supply company, and oil and gas holdings.
Pacific Gas & Electric v. Public Utilities Commission, 475 U.S. 1 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case involving a dispute over newsletters that the San Francisco–based privately-owned public utility Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) had included with its monthly bills to customers.
The California Commission on Judicial Performance is responsible for investigating complaints of judicial misconduct, judicial incapacity, and disciplining state judges, and is composed of 11 members, each appointed four-year terms: 3 judges appointed by the California Supreme Court, 4 members appointed by the governor (2 attorneys and 2 non ...