When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Frontiers in Psychology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frontiers_in_Psychology

    Frontiers in Psychology is a peer-reviewed open-access academic journal covering all aspects of psychology. It was established in 2010 and is published by Frontiers Media, a controversial company that is included in Jeffrey Beall's list of "potential, possible, or probable predatory publishers".

  3. Member check - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_check

    In qualitative research, a member check, also known as informant feedback or respondent validation, is a technique used by researchers to help improve the accuracy, credibility, validity, and transferability (also known as applicability, internal validity, [1] or fittingness) of a study. [2]

  4. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standards_for_Educational...

    The 2014 edition is the 7th edition of The Standards, and it shares the exact same names as the 1985 and 1999 editions. [3] Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques: A preliminary proposal (1952) and Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques (1954) editions were quite brief.

  5. Frontiers Media - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frontiers_Media

    Frontiers Media SA is a publisher of peer-reviewed, open access, scientific journals [2] currently active in science, technology, and medicine.It was founded in 2007 by Kamila and Henry Markram. [1]

  6. List of topics characterized as pseudoscience - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topics...

    [481] [482] Polygraphy has little credibility among scientists. [483] [484] Despite claims of 90–95% validity by polygraph advocates, and 95–100% by businesses providing polygraph services, [485] critics maintain that rather than a "test", the method amounts to an inherently unstandardizable interrogation technique whose accuracy cannot be ...

  7. Intelligence source and information reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_source_and...

    According to Ewen Montagu, John Godfrey devised this system when he was director of the Naval Intelligence Division (N.I.D.) around the time of World War II. [5] The system employed by the United States Armed Forces rates the reliability of the source as well as the information. The source reliability is rated between A (history of complete ...

  8. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    Instead, the credibility conferred by the "peer-reviewed" label could diminish what Feynman calls the culture of doubt necessary for science to operate a self-correcting, truth-seeking process. [176] The effects of this can be seen in the ongoing replication crisis, hoaxes, and widespread outrage over the inefficacy of the current system.

  9. Credibility revolution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credibility_revolution

    Studies driving the credibility revolution have made use of better quality data, and also econometric techniques such as difference in differences, instrumental variables, regression discontinuity, natural experiments, and even, when funding and opportunity permit, true randomized experiments. These techniques have made it possible (in ...