Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Power is the ability to influence behavior [3] and may not be fully assessable until it is challenged with equal force. [4] Unlike power, which can be latent, dominance is a manifest condition characterized by individual, [5] situational and relationship patterns in which attempts to control another party or parties may or may not be accepted. [6]
In evolutionary psychology and evolutionary anthropology, dual strategies theory states humans increase their status in social hierarchies using two major strategies known as dominance and prestige. The first and oldest of the two strategies, dominance, is exemplified by the use of force, implied force or other forms of coercion to take social ...
The metadata below describe the original scanning. Follow the "All Files: HTTP" link in the "View the book" box to the left to find XML files that contain more metadata about the original images and the derived formats (OCR results, PDF etc.).
Created Date: 8/30/2012 4:52:52 PM
A comprehensive reference from a computational perspective; see Sections 3.4.3, 4.5. Downloadable free online. "Strict Dominance in Mixed Strategies – Game Theory 101". gametheory101.com. Retrieved 2021-12-17. Watson Joel. Strategy : An Introduction to Game Theory. Third ed. W.W. Norton & Company 2013.
%PDF-1.4 %âãÏÓ 9 0 obj > endobj xref 9 15 0000000016 00000 n 0000000786 00000 n 0000000864 00000 n 0000000993 00000 n 0000001111 00000 n 0000001552 00000 n 0000001973 00000 n 0000002429 00000 n 0000002506 00000 n 0000002752 00000 n 0000002992 00000 n 0000003232 00000 n 0000005400 00000 n 0000005789 00000 n 0000000596 00000 n trailer ...
Dominator culture refers to a model of society where fear and force maintain rigid understandings of power and superiority within a hierarchical structure. [1] Futurist and writer Riane Eisler first popularized this term in her book The Chalice and the Blade (HarperCollins San Francisco, 1987). [2]
The theory proposed by Goldberg is that social institutions that are characterised by male dominance may be explained by biological differences between men and women (sexual dimorphism), suggesting male dominance could be inevitable. Goldberg later refined articulation of the argument in Why Men Rule (1993). [1]