Ads
related to: wikipedia ai editing- Free Writing Assistant
Improve grammar, punctuation,
conciseness, and more.
- Free Plagiarism Checker
Compare text to billions of web
pages and major content databases.
- Free Citation Generator
Get citations within seconds.
Never lose points over formatting.
- Free Spell Checker
Improve your spelling in seconds.
Avoid simple spelling errors.
- Free Writing Assistant
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Subsets of the Wikipedia corpus are considered the largest well-curated data sets available for AI training. [ 19 ] [ 20 ] A 2012 paper reported that more than 1,000 academic articles, including those using artificial intelligence, examine Wikipedia, reuse information from Wikipedia, use technical extensions linked to Wikipedia, or research ...
Welcome to WikiProject AI Cleanup—a collaboration to combat the increasing problem of unsourced, poorly written AI-generated content on Wikipedia. If you would like to help, add yourself as a participant in the project, inquire on the talk page , and see the to-do list .
AI images and German Wikipedia, results of a meeting; A Battle for Reality, video essay on AI images and Wikipedia; Wikimedia Commons AI, a rejected proposal for a new Wikimedia sister project aimed at establishing a clear distinction between human-generated content and content produced by artificial intelligence
Identifying AI-assisted edits is difficult in most cases since the generated text is often indistinguishable from human text. Some exceptions are if the text contains phrases like "as an AI model" or "as of my last knowledge update" and if the editor copy-pasted the prompt used to generate the text together with the AI response.
Wikipedia is not the place to host your blog or personal web page, or to promote yourself, your company, your band, etc. If you are here to do only one thing and that one thing is prohibited by policy, guideline, and/or consensus, then this is not the project for you.
It seems ChatGPT uses Wikipedia's policy pages in addition to articles for its dataset. Based on the results, AI models seem to be a very powerful brainstorming tool, and via prompt engineering, these AI do allow an impressive amount of refinement to the plan. AI can also be a great tool as a pointer to potential sources and can remind editors ...
The researchers also conducted a small qualitative analysis "to better understand the motivations for using LLMs to create Wikipedia pages", by manually inspecting the edit histories of a smaller subset, namely "the 45 English articles flagged as AI-generated by both GPTZero and Binoculars" (corresponding to 1.5% of those 2,909), and looking at ...
There appears to be coordinated disruptive editing going on. While the 15.ai article has experienced vandalism before, the current situation is unprecedented. The above editor's removal of well-sourced content followed by claims of insufficient citations is particularly concerning.