Ads
related to: best sources for reliable information in research proposal journal- Get Automated Citations
Get citations within seconds.
Never lose points over formatting.
- Free Writing Assistant
Improve grammar, punctuation,
conciseness, and more.
- Free Spell Checker
Improve your spelling in seconds.
Avoid simple spelling errors.
- Free Plagiarism Checker
Compare text to billions of web
pages and major content databases.
- Free Essay Checker
Proofread your essay with ease.
Writing that makes the grade.
- Free Punctuation Checker
Fix punctuation and spelling.
Find errors instantly.
- Get Automated Citations
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Biomedical database with a focus on drug and pharmaceutical research. Records from over 8,500 journals (1947–present). Subscription Elsevier: FSTA – Food Science and Technology Abstracts: Food science, Food technology, Nutrition: 1,500,000 The database of information on food science, food technology and nutrition Subscription
Whether a source is usable also depends on context. Sources that are reliable for some material are not reliable for other material. For instance, otherwise unreliable self-published sources are usually acceptable to support uncontroversial information about the source's author. You should always try to use the best possible source ...
For a source to be added to this list, editors generally expect two or more significant discussions about the source's reliability in the past, or an uninterrupted request for comment on the source's reliability that took place on the reliable sources noticeboard. For a discussion to be considered significant, most editors expect no fewer than ...
This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...
The journal was established in 2015 with the idea of publishing research outputs of different kinds including computer programs, experimental data, and analysis workflows. [4] One year after its foundation, it received a SPARC Innovator Award from the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition for its work in encouraging transparency ...
The Handbooks in Economics series often provides a reliable overview of a field, and a useful guide for finding reliable sources.; The Journal of Economic Literature contains broad literature reviews of areas of research in economics, and can provide guides towards areas that may be too specific to be contained in the Handbooks in Economics series.
It's probably best to be skeptical about other markers. Matters unrelated to their writing such as sex scandals might or might not indicate anything. Awards and accolades might matter some, depending on the source, but it's probably best to avoid giving much importance to man-of-the-year type logrolling.
The best sources in basic science are peer reviewed research articles in reputable journals i.e. primary sources by the WP's definition. The basic science equivalent to secondary sources, i.e. reviews of a developing research field, often just contain a brief summary of the primary research and can be colored by the authors' own view point.