When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Section 230 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230

    The statute specifically excepts federal criminal liability (§230(e)(1)), electronic privacy violations (§230(e)(4)) and intellectual property claims (§230(e)(2)). [6] There is also no immunity from state laws that are consistent with 230(e)(3) though state criminal laws have been held preempted in cases such as Backpage.com, LLC v.

  3. Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnes_v._Yahoo!,_Inc.

    Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc., 570 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 2009), [1] is a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case in which the Ninth Circuit held that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) rules that Yahoo!, Inc., as an Internet service provider cannot be held responsible for failure to remove objectionable content posted to their website by a third party.

  4. Communications Decency Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Decency_Act

    Second, Section 230 of title 47 of the U.S. Code, part of a codification of the Communications Act of 1934 (Section 9 of the Communications Decency Act / Section 509 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996) [3] has been interpreted to mean that operators of Internet services are not publishers (and thus not legally liable for the words of third ...

  5. FOSTA-SESTA - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOSTA-SESTA

    FOSTA-SESTA; Long title: A bill to amend the Communications Act of 1934 to clarify that section 230 of such Act does not prohibit the enforcement against providers and users of interactive computer services of Federal and State criminal and civil law relating to sexual exploitation of children or sex trafficking, and for other purposes.

  6. Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Protection_and...

    The Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act of 1988, title VII, subtitle N of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100–690, 102 Stat. 4181, enacted November 18, 1988, H.R. 5210, is part of a United States Act of Congress which places record-keeping requirements on the producers of actual, sexually explicit materials.

  7. Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_47_of_the_Code_of...

    Cornell Law, Legal information institute reference for Title 47; FCC, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) -Title 47-GPO Bookstore, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) GPO, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, Title 47 Telecommunication

  8. Gonzalez v. Google LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzalez_v._Google_LLC

    Gonzalez v. Google LLC, 598 U.S. 617 (2023), was a case at the Supreme Court of the United States which dealt with the question of whether or not recommender systems are covered by liability exemptions under section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, which was established by section 509 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, for Internet service providers (ISPs) in dealing with terrorism ...

  9. United States defamation law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law

    America Online, 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997), and Blumenthal v. Drudge, 992 F. Supp. 44 (D.D.C. 1998), have demonstrated that although courts are expressly uneasy with applying § 230, they are bound to find providers like AOL immune from defamatory postings. This immunity applies even if the providers are notified of defamatory material and ...