Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Billing . Amount of Dispute $_____ Community Guidelines / Online Behavior . Other
Pincus v. Yahoo! Inc., 13-cv-05326, was a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose, California. Brian Pincus was seeking a class-action suit to represent non-Yahoo customers whose email address was intercepted by Yahoo! who allegedly targets ads to increase its revenue. [9] [10] [11]
Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc., 570 F.3d 1096 (9th Cir. 2009), [1] is a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case in which the Ninth Circuit held that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) rules that Yahoo!, Inc., as an Internet service provider cannot be held responsible for failure to remove objectionable content posted to their website by a third party.
Yahoo!, Inc., [5] there has never been a ruling stating that Section 230 provides general immunity from all types of claims. [1] After facing some criticism about how this ruling contradicted others on Section 230 immunity, the Ninth Circuit withdrew its September 2014 decision and agreed to rehear the case in 2015.
Stay updated with breaking news, politics, sports, and the latest headlines on AOL.com.
Get breaking news and the latest headlines on business, entertainment, politics, world news, tech, sports, videos and much more from AOL
Get the latest news, politics, sports, and weather updates on AOL.com.
Fake news websites deliberately publish hoaxes, propaganda, and disinformation to drive web traffic inflamed by social media. [8] [9] [10] These sites are distinguished from news satire as fake news articles are usually fabricated to deliberately mislead readers, either for profit or more ambiguous reasons, such as disinformation campaigns.