Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Domicile of Choice. When a person is legally allowed to change their domicile of origin, they can acquire a domicile of choice. [12] However, until an individual obtains a new domicile of choice, their domicile of origin remains. [10] Domicile of choice can be achieved by intention and residence. [13]
The choice of law rule, the law of the domicile (lex domicilii) if the forum is common law or law of nationality (lex patriae) or habitual residence if the forum is civil law, applies to determine all question of status and its legal attributes.
Although this provides a convenient law which is usually easy to identify (since the requirements for change of domicile depend on demonstrating an intention to reside indefinitely in the state of choice, the domicile of the husband is difficult to change) it may produce a result in which a person is domiciled in one state but the matrimonial ...
Conflict of laws – Jurisdiction – Matrimonial proceedings – Domicile – Abandonment of domicile of origin and acquisition of domicile of choice. T(D) v L(F) & Anor , [2003] IESC 59 is a reported Irish Supreme Court case in which the Court held that in relation to foreign divorce proceedings, the burden of proof is on the parties to ...
Under the laws of Hungary (their lex domicilii) and Italy, the religious form of divorce was invalid, but it was recognised as effective by the law of Israel where they acquired a domicile of choice. Subsequently, the wife moved to Canada and, without abandoning her Israeli domicile, went through a second ceremony of marriage. The second ...
8(1) The domicile and habitual residence of each person is in the state and a subdivision thereof in which that person's principal home is situated and in which that person intends to reside. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), unless a contrary intention is shown, a person is presumed to intend to reside indefinitely in the state and ...
The general principle of the Regulation is that individuals should only be sued in their member state of domicile. Domicile under the Regulation is not equivalent to the common law doctrine of domicile, but rather refers to a person's habitual or ordinary residence. The Regulation sets out a finite number of exceptions from this general principle.
This was followed in 1980 by the Rome Convention, which addressed choice-of-law rules for contract disputes within EU member states. [28] In 2009 and 2010, respectively, the EU enacted the Rome II Regulation to address choice-of-law in tort cases [11] and the Rome III Regulation to address choice-of-law in divorce matters. [29]