Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The court now considers about 900 appeals per year and accepts review in about one in eight cases. [1] Before the Court of Appeals was created, the Minnesota Supreme Court handled about 1,800 cases a year. Certain appeals can go directly to the Supreme Court, such as those involving taxes, first degree murder, and workers' compensation.
Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity.
Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon and House Democrats have asked the state's highest court to intervene in a partisan power struggle that has roiled the start of the 2025 legislative session.
Whether, even though Congress excluded from list of factors to consider when revoking supervised release, a district court may rely on the Section 3553(a)(2)(A) factors when revoking supervised release. October 21, 2024 (February 25, 2025) FCC v. Consumers' Research: 24-354 24-422
Students rotate between classes at Clay County's Lake Asbury Elementary School in this 2007 photo. The school had a little fewer than 1,400 students when the photo was taken, about bit more than ...
Danforth v. Minnesota, 552 U.S. 264 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that state courts can retroactively apply a new constitutional rule of criminal procedure in post-conviction proceedings by applying state law retroactivity standards that are broader than the Teague v. Lane standard. [1] [2] [3] [4]
More Clay County offices and agencies, including the courts, will begin to reopen Monday. On Friday afternoon, the Clay County Emergency Management Agency announced Clay County Superior Court will ...
The Court agreed to hear the case, and oral arguments were heard on February 28, 2018. [2] The Court announced judgment in favor of the voters on June 14, 2018, voting 7–2 to reverse and remand to the lower court because the Minnesota law was an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment.