Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, 598 U.S. 69 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that debts incurred by fraud cannot be discharged in bankruptcy, regardless of whether the debtor committed the fraud.
County of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case which involved the question of within what period of time must a suspect arrested without a warrant (warrantless arrests) be brought into court to determine if there is probable cause for holding the suspect in custody.
A Belgian court convicted the founders of the once high-flying speech recognition software company Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products of fraud, writing the final chapter in the story of a company ...
Hence, justifying restricting speech in those cases. Alvarez remained in legal trouble due to allegations that he defrauded the government by falsely receiving health insurance benefits. He was convicted of misappropriation of public funds, grand theft , and insurance fraud in 2009 and sentenced to five years in state prison, [ 37 ] and was ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving First Amendment free speech protections for government employees. The plaintiff in the case was a district attorney who claimed that he had been passed up for a promotion for criticizing the legitimacy of a warrant.
The new case was presented in front of the entire Ninth Circuit panel on December 15, 2011, in San Francisco. [11] The result of the hearing was published April 10, 2012, and states that the court chose a narrow interpretation of the CFAA, holding that the phrase "exceeds authorized access" in the CFAA does not extend to violations of use ...