When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gibbard's theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbard's_theorem

    Gibbard's 1978 theorem states that a nondeterministic voting method is only strategyproof if it's a mixture of unilateral and duple rules. For instance, the rule that flips a coin and chooses a random dictator if the coin lands on heads, or chooses the pairwise winner between two random candidates if the coin lands on tails, is strategyproof.

  3. Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbard–Satterthwaite...

    Gibbard's proof of the theorem is more general and covers processes of collective decision that may not be ordinal, such as cardinal voting. [note 1] Gibbard's 1978 theorem and Hylland's theorem are even more general and extend these results to non-deterministic processes, where the outcome may depend partly on chance; the Duggan–Schwartz ...

  4. Strategic voting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_voting

    Strategic or tactical voting is voting in consideration of possible ballots cast by other voters in order to maximize one's satisfaction with the election's results. [1] Gibbard's theorem shows that no voting system has a single "always-best" strategy, i.e. one that always maximizes a voter's satisfaction with the result, regardless of other ...

  5. Electoral system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_system

    Gibbard's theorem, built upon the earlier Arrow's theorem and the Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem, to prove that for any single-winner deterministic voting methods, at least one of the following three properties must hold: The process is dictatorial, i.e. there is a single voter whose vote chooses the outcome.

  6. Proof of impossibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_impossibility

    Gibbard's theorem shows that any strategyproof game form (i.e. one with a dominant strategy) with more than two outcomes is dictatorial. The Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem is a special case showing that no deterministic voting system can be fully invulnerable to strategic voting in all circumstances, regardless of how others vote.

  7. Rated voting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rated_voting

    On a rated ballot, the voter may rate each choice independently. An approval voting ballot does not require ranking or exclusivity. Rated, evaluative, [1] [2] graded, [1] or cardinal voting rules are a class of voting methods that allow voters to state how strongly they support a candidate, [3] by giving each one a grade on a separate scale.

  8. Two charts and a map to help make sense of all the early ...

    www.aol.com/two-charts-map-help-sense-170306989.html

    The pandemic-era 2020 election had the highest ever early vote totals, at more than 101 million, or 63% of all votes cast. But beside 2020, the share of early votes has remained steady since 2012 ...

  9. Revelation principle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revelation_principle

    The revelation principle shows that, while Gibbard's theorem proves it is impossible to design a system that will always be fully invulnerable to strategy (if we do not know how players will behave), it is possible to design a system that encourages honesty given a solution concept (if the corresponding equilibrium is unique). [3] [4]