Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The balanced scorecard has more recently become a key component of structured approaches to corporate strategic management. [6] Two of the ideas that underpin modern balanced scorecard designs concern making it easier to select which data to observe, and ensuring that the choice of data is consistent with the ability of the observer to ...
BSC SWOT, or the Balanced Scorecard SWOT analysis, was introduced in 2001, by Lennart Norberg and Terry Brown. BSC SWOT is a simple concept that combines the two powerful tools BSC ( Balanced Scorecard ) and SWOT analysis when identifying factors that drives or hinders strategy .
In management, a strategy map is a diagram that documents the strategic goals being pursued by an organization or management team.It is an element of the documentation associated with the Balanced Scorecard, and in particular is characteristic of the second generation of Balanced Scorecard designs that first appeared during the mid-1990s.
In business performance management, a third-generation balanced scorecard is a version of the traditional balanced scorecard, a structured report, supported by design methods and automated tools, that can be used by managers to keep track of the execution of activities by the staff within their control, and to monitor the consequences arising from these actions.
David P. Norton (1941–2023) was an American business theorist, business executive and management consultant, known as co-creator, together with Robert S. Kaplan, of the Balanced Scorecard. [1] [2] David P. Norton co-founded Palladium Group, Inc. (previously Balanced Scorecard Collaborative) and served as its chief executive officer. [3]
Only a diversified company with a balanced portfolio can use its strengths to truly capitalize on its growth opportunities. The balanced portfolio has: stars whose high share and high growth assure the future; cash cows that supply funds for that future growth; and; question marks to be converted into stars with the added funds. [citation needed]
The study creates a new set of models that treats each of these systems like the pillars they are—that is, if one falls, the rest soon follow suit due to the interconnected nature of each system.
Triple bottom line is one framework for reporting this material impact. This is distinct from the more limited changes required to deal only with ecological issues. The triple bottom line has also been extended to encompass four pillars, known as the quadruple bottom line (QBL).