When.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network

2. ReadyBoost - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReadyBoost

   Windows 7 supports multiple flash drives for ReadyBoost, so performance improvement similar to RAID 0 can be expected. The ReadyBoost algorithm was improved in Windows 7, resulting in better performance. One experiment showed reading of flash memory up to 5–10 times faster than Windows Vista due to higher hit rate. [citation needed]

3. Windows 10, version 21H2 - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_10,_version_21H2

   The Windows 10 November 2021 Update [1] (codenamed "21H2" [2]) is the twelfth major update to Windows 10 as the cumulative update to the May 2021 Update. It carries the build number 10.0.19044. It carries the build number 10.0.19044.

4. Windows 10, version 21H1 - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_10,_version_21H1

   The Windows 10 May 2021 Update [1] (codenamed "21H1" [2]) is the eleventh major update to Windows 10. It carries the build number 10.0.19043. Version history.

5. Virtual memory compression - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_memory_compression

   By reducing the I/O activity caused by paging requests, virtual memory compression can produce overall performance improvements. The degree of performance improvement depends on a variety of factors, including the availability of any compression co-processors, spare bandwidth on the CPU, speed of the I/O channel, speed of the physical memory, and the compressibility of the physical memory ...

6. Windows 10, version 20H2 - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_10,_version_20H2

   Windows 10 October 2020 Update [1] (codenamed "20H2" [2]) is the tenth major update to Windows 10 as the cumulative update to the May 2020 Update. It carries the ...

7. Intel Turbo Memory - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Turbo_Memory

   Ars Technica wrote in 2009 that Turbo Memory "never took off", [15] and CNET similarly pronounced that it was "never widely adopted", [16] because "Turbo Memory (and Turbo Memory 2.0) wasn't cheap, and it definitely wasn't worth the cost." [17] In 2009 Intel had announced the successor to Turbo Memory for the 5-Series mobile chipsets, codename ...