When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Dolan v. United States Postal Service - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolan_v._United_States...

    Dolan v. United States Postal Service, 546 U.S. 481 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, involving the extent to which the United States Postal Service has sovereign immunity from lawsuits brought by private individuals under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

  3. Federal Tort Claims Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Tort_Claims_Act

    The Federal Tort Claims Act (August 2, 1946, ch. 646, Title IV, 60 Stat. 812, 28 U.S.C. Part VI, Chapter 171 and 28 U.S.C. § 1346) ("FTCA") is a 1946 federal statute that permits private parties to sue the United States in a federal court for most torts committed by persons acting on behalf of the United States.

  4. Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Employees...

    The Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1988, also known as the Westfall Act, is a law passed by the United States Congress that modifies the Federal Tort Claims Act to protect federal employees from common law tort lawsuit while engaged in their duties for the government, while giving private citizens a route to seek damage from the government for violations.

  5. Sheridan v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheridan_v._United_States

    Sheridan v. United States, 487 U.S. 392 (1988), was a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning what constitutes a claim "arising out of" an assault or battery within the meaning of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). The Supreme Court held that the FTCA's intentional tort exception did not apply.

  6. United States tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_tort_law

    Dolan v. United States Postal Service, post office immune under the Federal Tort Claims Act; Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950), US immune from suit from members of the military; Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. (1981) holding that the police were not responsible for failing (though repeatedly warned) to ...

  7. Hartman v. Moore - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartman_v._Moore

    He also sought recovery from the federal government of the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). The District Court dismissed the claims against the Assistant United States Attorney in accordance with the absolute immunity for prosecutorial judgment, and rejected an abuse of process claim against the inspectors. [3]

  8. Finley v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finley_v._United_States

    Finley v. United States, 490 U.S. 545 , was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States addressing the jurisdictional requirements of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). [1] In response to the Finley decision, the United States Congress enacted a new statute on supplemental jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1367. [2]

  9. United States v. Johnson (1987) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Johnson...

    United States v. Johnson, 481 U.S. 681 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court barred the widow of a serviceman killed while piloting a helicopter on a United States Coast Guard rescue mission from bringing her claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act (the "FTCA" or the "Act"). [1]