When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Tison v. Arizona - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tison_v._Arizona

    Tison v. Arizona, 481 U.S. 137 (1987), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court qualified the rule it set forth in Enmund v. Florida (1982). Just as in Enmund, in Tison the Court applied the proportionality principle to conclude that the death penalty was an appropriate punishment for a felony murderer who was a major participant in the underlying felony and exhibited a ...

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 137

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Supreme Court of the United States 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W  /  38.89056°N 77.00444°W  / 38.89056; -77.00444 Established March 4, 1789 ; 235 years ago (1789-03-04) Location Washington, D.C. Coordinates 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W  /  38.89056°N 77.00444°W  / 38.89056; -77.00444 Composition method Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation Authorised by ...

  4. Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirtsaeng_v._John_Wiley...

    John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 568 U.S. 519 (2013), is a United States Supreme Court copyright decision in which the Court held, 6–3, that the first-sale doctrine exhausts copyright of the works lawfully made or purchased abroad.

  5. Auer v. Robbins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auer_v._Robbins

    Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997), is a United States Supreme Court case that concerns the standard that the Court should apply when it reviews an executive department's interpretation of regulations established under federal legislation.

  6. Moore v. Texas (2017) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._Texas_(2017)

    Moore v. Texas, 137 S. Ct. 1039 (2017), is a United States Supreme Court decision about the death penalty and intellectual disability.The court held that contemporary clinical standards determine what an intellectual disability is, and held that even milder forms of intellectual disability may bar a person from being sentenced to death due to the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel ...

  7. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kumho_Tire_Co._v._Carmichael

    The tire expert's testimony rested on such unscientific "observation and experience", and so the Eleventh Circuit reasoned the district court should have made a different ruling based on their legal reasoning over Rule 702 without the Daubert gloss. Kumho Tire asked the Supreme Court to review whether Daubert applied solely to scientific evidence.

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_Lutheran_Church_of...

    Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Missouri program that denied a grant to a religious school for playground resurfacing, while providing grants to similarly situated non-religious groups, violated the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to ...