Ads
related to: ohio court of records search warrantscourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
searchpublicrecords.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
myheritage.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the constitutionality of "anticipatory" search warrants under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10 (1948), was a significant United States Supreme Court decision addressing search warrants and the Fourth Amendment.In this case, where federal agents had probable cause to search a hotel room but did not obtain a warrant, the Court declared the search was "unreasonable."
A search warrant is a court order that a magistrate or judge issues to authorize law enforcement officers to conduct a search of a person, location, or vehicle for evidence of a crime and to confiscate any evidence they find. In most countries, a search warrant cannot be issued in aid of civil process.
Getting a search warrant begins in a police department and ends with a specific, restricted list of items allowed to be seized on a specific property.
The Ohio Supreme Court is considering other public records cases that could have sweeping implications for open government. Two cases involve how to interpret Marsy's Law, a voter-approved ...
The redacted search warrant affidavit, along with a redacted copy of the legal brief that justified redactions to the affidavit, [n] were unsealed and made public on August 26. [194] [195] The New York Times, The Washington Post, and CNN released annotated versions of the search warrant affidavit as well. [196] [197] [4]
Ad
related to: ohio court of records search warrantscourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month