When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: defendant search miami dade

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Florida v. Jardines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_v._Jardines

    Florida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. 1 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case which resulted in the decision that police use of a trained detection dog to sniff for narcotics on the front porch of a private home is a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and therefore, without consent, requires both probable cause and a search warrant.

  3. Criminal fraudsters and an ex-prosecutor among disciplined ...

    www.aol.com/criminal-fraudsters-ex-prosecutor...

    After a medical negligence lawsuit filed in Miami-Dade by Miami’s Emelike Nwosuocha for client Ana Diaz got dismissed with prejudice in 2019, the trial court awarded the defendant attorney’s fees.

  4. Judge denies bond for two men charged with trying to kill ...

    www.aol.com/judge-denies-bond-two-men-093000453.html

    Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Alberto Milian couldn’t be swayed to release the men, Atiba Moore and accused shooter Steve Gallon IV. Gallon is the son of long-time Miami-Dade School Board ...

  5. Dan Markel murder: Walkthrough of witnesses making the ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/dan-markel-murder-walkthrough...

    Jonathan Grossman, a Miami-Dade Police Department homicide detective who backed up testimony by Rivera that during the hitmen's drive to Tallahassee, Garcia accidentally shot a hole in the ...

  6. Edward Cowart - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Cowart

    Edward Douglas Cowart [2] was born in Plant City, Florida. [3] He served as a Miami police officer before entering the judiciary. Cowart received his Bachelor of Arts at the University of Miami in 1950 and his Juris Doctor from Stetson University College of Law in 1952. [4]

  7. Florida v. J. L. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_v._J._L.

    Florida v. J. L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that a police officer may not legally stop and frisk someone based solely on an anonymous tip that describes a person's location and appearance, but does not furnish information as to any illegal conduct.