When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Vicarious liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability

    Vicarious liability is a form of a strict, secondary liability that arises under the common law doctrine of agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability, or duty to control" the activities of a violator.

  3. United States tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_tort_law

    The most common federal tort claim is the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 remedy for violation of one's civil rights under color of federal or state law, which can be used to sue for anything from a free speech claim to use of excessive force by the police.

  4. Federal Tort Claims Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Tort_Claims_Act

    The Federal Tort Claims Act (August 2, 1946, ch. 646, Title IV, 60 Stat. 812, 28 U.S.C. Part VI, Chapter 171 and 28 U.S.C. § 1346) ("FTCA") is a 1946 federal statute that permits private parties to sue the United States in a federal court for most torts committed by persons acting on behalf of the United States.

  5. Respondeat superior - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respondeat_superior

    Respondeat superior (Latin: "let the master answer"; plural: respondeant superiores) is a doctrine that a party is responsible for (and has vicarious liability for) acts of his agents. [ 1 ] : 794 For example, in the United States, there are circumstances when an employer is liable for acts of employees performed within the course of their ...

  6. Secondary liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_liability

    The concept of vicarious liability was developed in the Second Circuit as an extension of the common law doctrine of agency – respondeat superior (the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate). Pursuant to this doctrine, courts recognized that employers should be liable for the infringing acts of their employees under ...

  7. Qui facit per alium facit per se - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qui_facit_per_alium_facit...

    It is a maxim often stated in discussing the liability of employer for the act of employee in terms of vicarious liability." [3] According to this maxim, if in the nature of things, the master is obliged to perform the duties by employing servants, he is responsible for their act in the same way that he is responsible for his own acts. [4]

  8. US Supreme Court split over government liability for credit ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-split-over...

    The justices heard arguments in an appeal by President Joe Biden's administration of a lower court's ruling that a legal doctrine called sovereign immunity does not shield the U.S. government from ...

  9. Attribution (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_(law)

    Doctrines of attribution are legal doctrines by which liability is extended to a defendant who did not actually commit the criminal act. [1]: 347 [2]: 665 Examples include vicarious liability (when acts of another are imputed or "attributed" to a defendant), attempt to commit a crime (even though it was never completed), and conspiracy to commit a crime (when it is not completed or which is ...