When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_consistent...

    Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements, in the law of evidence, occur where a witness, testifying at trial, makes a statement that is either consistent or inconsistent, respectively, with a previous statement given at an earlier time such as during a discovery, interview, or interrogation.

  3. R v B (KG) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_B_(KG)

    R v B (KG), [1993] 1 SCR 740, popularly known as the KGB case, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the admissibility of prior inconsistent statements as proof of the truth of their contents. Prior to this case, prior inconsistent statements made by a witness other than an accused could merely be used to impeach the witness's ...

  4. Hearsay in United States law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_United_States_law

    If the prior statement is inconsistent with the current statement, the prior statement may be used both for impeachment (to prove the witness is lying) and substantively (for the truth of what the first statement asserts). Similarly, prior consistent statements being used to rebut an attack on the declarant's credibility, e.g. that the ...

  5. Witness impeachment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witness_impeachment

    A prior inconsistent statement offered solely for impeachment purposes is admissible regardless of whether it satisfies those requirements. The cross-examining attorney need not disclose or show the contents of a prior inconsistent statement to a witness prior to the moment he is questioned.

  6. Jencks Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jencks_Act

    Noting that prior statements of a witness that "relate generally to the events and activities testified to" by him must be produced in the Jencks Act, the court said that since the statement in question related to the subject matter as to which the witness had testified, the statute left no room for the trial court, nor for the present court ...

  7. Browne v Dunn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browne_v_Dunn

    Browne v. Dunn (1893) 6 R. 67, H.L. is a famous British House of Lords decision on the rules of cross examination.From this case came the common law rule known as the "Browne v Dunn rule" or "The rule in Browne v Dunn".

  8. Category:Statements - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Statements

    Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements; Proposition; Propositional formula; Protocol implementation conformance statement; Proxy statement; R.

  9. Category:Evidence law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Evidence_law

    Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements; Proffer; Proffer agreement; Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy; Provenance;