When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Declaration against interest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_against_interest

    In United States law, a declaration (or statement) against interest is an exception to the rule on hearsay in which a person's statement may be used, where generally the content of the statement is so prejudicial to the person making it that they would not have made the statement unless they believed the statement was true. For example, if a ...

  3. Party admission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_admission

    The word "admission" connotes that the statement must be harmful. However, the party admission exemption does not in any way require that the admission be a representation against the party's interest – a "statement against interest." "Statements against interest" made by other witnesses are sometimes admissible over the hearsay exception ...

  4. Hearsay in United States law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_United_States_law

    Hearsay is testimony from a witness under oath who is reciting an out-of-court statement that is being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. The Federal Rules of Evidence prohibit introducing hearsay statements during applicable federal court proceedings, unless one of nearly thirty exemptions or exceptions applies. [1]

  5. Hearsay - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay

    Statement against interest; Statement of personal or family history; Forfeiture by wrongdoing; Though a hearsay statement may be admissible through an exception, the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides a specific constitutional protection for criminal defendants. The Sixth Amendment provides that "In all criminal ...

  6. Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_consistent...

    A prior consistent statement is not a hearsay exception; the FRE specifically define it as non-hearsay. A prior consistent statement is admissible: to rebut an express or implied charge that the declarant recently fabricated a statement, for instance, during her testimony at trial; the witness testifies at the present trial; and

  7. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hillmon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_Life_Insurance_Co...

    Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hillmon, 145 U.S. 285 (1892), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that created one of the most important rules of evidence in American and British courtrooms: an exception to the hearsay rule for statements regarding the intentions of the declarant. [1]

  8. The unexpected significance of Trump trial witness Gary Farro

    www.aol.com/news/unexpected-significance-trump...

    Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. But hearsay evidence is usually inadmissible at trial. So to get hearsay, such as the contents of a business ...

  9. Crawford v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawford_v._Washington

    But Washington invoked a hearsay exception for statements against penal interest. [ 2 ] The defense counsel objected to the admission of the wife's statement, on the ground that Mr. Crawford would be unable to confront (i.e., cross-examine) Mrs. Crawford on her statement without waiving spousal privilege, and that this would be a violation of ...