When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: youtube copyright violations checker

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Content ID - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_ID

    Content ID. Content ID is a digital fingerprinting system developed by Google which is used to easily identify and manage copyrighted content on YouTube. Videos uploaded to YouTube are compared against audio and video files registered with Content ID by content owners, looking for any matches. Content owners have the choice to have matching ...

  3. YouTube copyright issues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_copyright_issues

    In May 2016, a YouTube user Matt Hosseinzadeh sued the YouTube channel h3h3productions (run by Ethan and Hila Klein) citing a video that criticized his content. Fellow YouTube user Philip DeFranco started a GoFundMe fundraiser entitled "Help for H3H3". [36] The initiative raised over $130,000.

  4. YouTube copyright strike - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_copyright_strike

    YouTube's own practice is to issue a "YouTube copyright strike" on the user accused of copyright infringement. [1] When a YouTube user gets hit with a copyright strike, they are required to watch a warning video about the rules of copyright and take trivia questions about the danger of copyright. [2] A copyright strike will expire after 90 days.

  5. Wikipedia:Copyrights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights

    Attribution To re-distribute text on Wikipedia in any form, provide credit to the authors either by including a) a hyperlink (where possible) or URL to the page or pages you are re-using, b) a hyperlink (where possible) or URL to an alternative, stable online copy which is freely accessible, which conforms with the license, and which provides credit to the authors in a manner equivalent to the ...

  6. Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viacom_International_Inc...

    Viacom International, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F.3d 19 (2nd Cir., 2012), was a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decision regarding liability for copyright infringement committed by the users of an online video hosting platform. [1]

  7. Wikipedia:Copyright violations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyright_violations

    If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed that all of their major contributions are likely to be copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately. This is especially the case for contributors who have active copyright investigation cases. a.

  8. Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright

    Unlike a patent, however, in most places (i.e., countries) you don't have to apply for a copyright – you get one automatically every time you produce creative work. A creative work can be almost anything – a book, a song, a picture, a photograph, a poem, a phrase, or a fictional character.

  9. Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Copyright...

    The second way that an OSP can be put on notice that its system contains infringing material, for purposes of section 512(d), is referred to the "red flag" test. [12] The "red flag" test stems from the language in the statute that requires that an OSP not be "aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent."