Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Language users build relationships with their interlocutors by expressing such positions. In other approaches in linguistics (including linguistic anthropology , sociolinguistics , corpus linguistics ), alternative terms such as evaluation [ 2 ] [ 3 ] or stance [ 4 ] [ 5 ] are preferred.
Evaluative questions ask discussion participants to form responses based on experiences, opinions, judgments, knowledge and/or values rather than texts. Basic or focus questions are interpretive questions which comprehensively address an aspect of interpreting a selection.
A follow-up with an evaluative function, commenting on the response to a question, is a distinguishing element of classroom conversation, and the difference between sequences with evaluative follow-ups compared to those serving as acknowledgements has been regarded as a major difference between display and referential questions.
The first form of defensive behavior is evaluation. [3] These are known as "you" statements and put all the focus on the other person. [citation needed] This kind of behavior is about judging the other communicator. [citation needed] In return the supportive behavior is description. [3]
In common usage, evaluation is a systematic determination and assessment of a subject's merit, worth and significance, using criteria governed by a set of standards.It can assist an organization, program, design, project or any other intervention or initiative to assess any aim, realizable concept/proposal, or any alternative, to help in decision-making; or to generate the degree of ...
BLEU (bilingual evaluation understudy) is an algorithm for evaluating the quality of text which has been machine-translated from one natural language to another. Quality is considered to be the correspondence between a machine's output and that of a human: "the closer a machine translation is to a professional human translation, the better it is" – this is the central idea behind BLEU.
A linguistic theory that aims for explanatory adequacy is concerned with the internal structure of the device [i.e. grammar]; that is, it aims to provide a principled basis, independent of any particular language, for the selection of the descriptively adequate grammar of each language. [4]
For example, according to Aikhenvald, a given language may use the same element to mark both evidentiality and mirativity, i.e., unexpected information. She claims that this is the case of Western Apache where the post-verbal particle lą̄ą̄ primarily functions as a mirative but also has a secondary function as an inferential evidential.