Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Generally scores below 0.20 corresponds to randomly chosen unrelated proteins whereas structures with a score higher than 0.5 assume roughly the same fold. [2] A quantitative study [3] shows that proteins of TM-score = 0.5 have a posterior probability of 37% in the same CATH topology family and of 13% in the same SCOP fold family. The ...
TM-align TM-score based protein structure alignment: Cα: Pair: nil: server and download: Y. Zhang & J. Skolnick: 2005 mTM-align Multiple protein structure alignment based on TM-align Cα Multi No server and download: R. Dong, Z. Peng, Y. Zhang & J. Yang 2018 VAST Vector Alignment Search Tool: SSE: Pair: nil: server: S. Bryant: 1996 PrISM
The score combines the log-likelihood of the alignment, a covariation term and the basepair probabilities. any: Yes: Yes: No: sourcecode [67] [68] Multilign: This method uses multiple Dynalign calculations to find a low free energy structure common to any number of sequences. It does not require any sequence identity. any: Yes: Yes: No ...
Tree calculation tool calculates phylogenetic tree using BioJava API and lets user draw trees using Archaeopteryx: Software is package of 7 interactive visual tools for multiple sequence alignments. Major focus is manipulating large alignments. Includes MSApad, MSA comparator, MSA reconstruction tool, FASTA generator and MSA ID matrix calculator
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
I-TASSER is a template-based method for protein structure and function prediction. [1] The pipeline consists of six consecutive steps: 1, Secondary structure prediction by PSSpred
TM-score – a different structure comparison measure; Longest continuous segment (LCS) — A different structure comparison measure; Global distance calculation (GDC_sc, GDC_all) — Structure comparison measures that use full-model information (not just α-carbon) to assess similarity
By the original design the GDT algorithm calculates 20 GDT scores, i.e. for each of 20 consecutive distance cutoffs (0.5 Å, 1.0 Å, 1.5 Å, ... 10.0 Å). [2] For structure similarity assessment it is intended to use the GDT scores from several cutoff distances, and scores generally increase with increasing cutoff.