When.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network

2. List of scholarly publishing stings - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scholarly...

   These are nonsense papers that were accepted by an academic journal or academic conference; the list does not include cases of scientific misconduct. The intent of such publications is typically to expose shortcomings in a journal's peer review process or to criticize the standards of pay-to-publish journals. The ethics of academic stings are ...

3. Who's Afraid of Peer Review? - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who's_Afraid_of_Peer_Review?

   Only 36 submissions generated review comments recognizing any of the paper's scientific problems. 16 of those 36 papers were nonetheless accepted, in spite of poor to damning reviews. Many of the journals that accepted the paper are published by prestigious institutions and publishing companies, including Elsevier, SAGE, Wolters Kluwer ...

4. Medical Care Research and Review - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_Care_Research_and...

   According to the Journal Citation Reports, its 2014 impact factor is 2.600, ranking it 25 out of 86 journals in the category "Health Care Sciences & Services" [1] and 12 out of 70 journals in the category "Health Policy & Services". [2]

5. Predatory publishing - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_publishing

   The journal gives unrealistic promises regarding the speed of the peer review process (hinting that the journal's peer review process is minimal or non-existent)—or boasts an equally unrealistic track-record; The journal does not describe copyright agreements clearly or demands the copyright of the paper while claiming to be an open-access ...

6. America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker - The Huffington Post

   highline.huffingtonpost.com/miracleindustry/...

   In 1999, Johnson & Johnson had signed a contract with a company called Excerpta Medica. Its specialty was medical marketing. Its sub-specialty was producing ghostwritten, data-filled studies on the efficacy and safety of a client’s drugs, finding the right academic scholars to be listed as the authors and then placing the articles in prestigious academic journals.

7. List of medical journals - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_medical_journals

   Journal of Medical Biochemistry: Biochemistry: Walter de Gruyter: English: 1982–present Journal of Medical Biography: Medical Personnel: SAGE Publishing: English: 1993–present Journal of Medical Case Reports: Medicine: BioMed Central: English: 2007–present Journal of Medical Economics: Medicine: Taylor and Francis Group: English: 1998 ...

8. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

   Richard Smith, MD, former editor of the British Medical Journal, has claimed that peer review is "ineffective, largely a lottery, anti-innovatory, slow, expensive, wasteful of scientific time, inefficient, easily abused, prone to bias, unable to detect fraud and irrelevant; Several studies have shown that peer review is biased against the ...

9. Medical journalism - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_journalism

   The main division is into (1) medical journalism for the general public, which includes medical coverage in general news publications and in specialty medical publications, and (2) medical journalism for doctors and other professionals, which often appears in peer-reviewed journals. [1] The accuracy of medical journalism varies widely.