Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
1961 NCAA University Division men's basketball gambling scandal; 1978–79 Boston College basketball point-shaving scandal; 2011 University of Miami athletics scandal; 2017–18 NCAA Division I men's basketball corruption scandal
The 2017–18 NCAA Division I men's basketball corruption scandal was a corruption scandal, initially involving sportswear manufacturer Adidas as well as several college basketball programs associated with the brand [1] [2] [3] but now involving many programs not affiliated with Adidas.
2017–18 NCAA Division I men's basketball corruption scandal – An ongoing FBI investigation into corruption in NCAA men's basketball that has so far resulted in the arrest of 10 individuals, including college assistant coaches from Arizona, Auburn, Oklahoma State, and USC plus high-ranking executives of sports apparel giant Adidas. Other ...
A years-long FBI investigation into corruption and bribery in college basketball has implicated several top players and programs. College basketball scandal: Timeline, summary of FBI investigation ...
The Arizona State basketball point-shaving scandal, which stretched from the late '90s into the early 2000s, involved several players, most notably Stevin "Hedake" Smith.
It has been used four times for other sports programs, though: University of Southwestern Louisiana basketball (1973-75), University of Kentucky basketball (1952-53), Morehouse College Soccer ...
The scandal involved 37 arrests of students from 22 different colleges, [1] [2] as well as at least nine players that received money from fixers or gamblers that were never convicted of crimes, eight go-betweens being prosecuted for their efforts in the scandal (including a couple of former college basketball players and a college football ...
The 1978–79 Boston College basketball point-shaving scandal involved a scheme in which members of the American Mafia recruited and bribed multiple Boston College Eagles men's basketball players to ensure the team would either not win by the required margin (not cover the point spread) or win by the required margin (cover the point spread), thus allowing gamblers in the know to place wagers ...