Ads
related to: psychology of dreams and religion pdf full text search postgresql tutorialdatacamp.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The biggest finding was related to dreams and religion included exploring this connection as a form of coping. [10] This effect of the Western worldview of dreams and dream interpretation with religious connotations has spread as far as the churches in Nigeria, Africa. These churches believed their leaders in the church would receive frequent ...
Patrick McNamara, Where God and science meet : how brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion, Praeger Publishers, 2006, ISBN 0275987884 [10] Patrick McNamara, Nightmares : the science and solution of those frightening visions during sleep, Praeger, 2008, ISBN 978-0313345128 [ 11 ]
Dreams were also considered prophetic or omens of particular significance. Artemidorus of Daldis, who lived in the 2nd century AD, wrote a comprehensive text Oneirocritica (The Interpretation of Dreams). [9] Although Artemidorus believed that dreams can predict the future, he presaged many contemporary approaches to dreams.
He is world-renowned for his scholarly contributions to the psychology of religion, and for providing clinically relevant scientific analyses of religion's role in mental health. Pargament has also written multiple books, including The Psychology of Religion and Coping: Theory, Research, Practice (1997; see article ), [ 5 ] and Spiritually ...
The Meaning of Dreams: 1953 "A Cognitive Theory of Dream Symbols," Journal of General Psychology, 48, 169-186: metaphoric theory of dream symbols 1954: A Primer of Freudian Psychology: 1957: Theories of Personality: 1966: The Content Analysis of Dreams: coding system co-authored with Robert Van de Castle 1970: Dreams, Life, and Literature ...
Michael Stausberg in a review for Fontana's book Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality wrote that most religious scholars would not consider his arguments valid and "empirical-minded scholars of religion would probably find some of [his] interpretations of religious traditions and their treatment somewhat questionable or naïve."