When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Worcester v. Georgia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worcester_v._Georgia

    Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.

  3. Elias Boudinot (Cherokee) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elias_Boudinot_(Cherokee)

    In 1832, while on a speaking tour of the North to raise funds for the Phoenix, Boudinot learned that, in Worcester v. Georgia, the US Supreme Court had sustained the Cherokee rights to political and territorial sovereignty within Georgia's borders. He soon learned that President Jackson still supported Indian Removal.

  4. Presidency of Andrew Jackson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidency_of_Andrew_Jackson

    With Jackson's support, Georgia and other states sought to extend their sovereignty over tribes within their borders, despite existing U.S. treaty obligations. [87] Georgia's dispute with the Cherokee culminated in the 1832 Supreme Court decision of Worcester v. Georgia.

  5. John Ross (Cherokee chief) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ross_(Cherokee_chief)

    But he did not compel President Jackson to take action that would defend the Cherokee from Georgia's laws, because he did not find that the U.S. Supreme Court had original jurisdiction over a case in which a tribe was a party. In 1832, the Supreme Court further defined the relation of the federal government and the Cherokee Nation. In Worcester v.

  6. Henry Baldwin (judge) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Baldwin_(judge)

    As part of its anti-Worcester campaign, the principal press organ of the Jackson administration published Johnson's anti-Cherokee concurrence in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia and promised to follow with Baldwin's Worcester dissent. Marshall's Worcester opinion appeared on March 22. Baldwin's lone dissent, delivered by a Jackson appointee, in a ...

  7. History of the United States government - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United...

    The Supreme Court ruled on tribal sovereignty early in Jackson's administration in 1832 in Worcester v. Georgia, but this did little to prevent the removals. [81] Congress also recognized the Bureau of Indian Affairs as an official government bureau in 1832. [68] Jackson was heavily involved in the monetary policy of the government.

  8. ‘It changed the world.’ How a 1984 Supreme Court decision ...

    www.aol.com/news/changed-world-1984-supreme...

    “College football, I think, is in terrible trouble.” Andy Coats fought — and won — a 1984 Supreme Court case that gave college football television freedom. Now, it may lead to its demise.

  9. Treaty of New Echota - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_New_Echota

    In 1832, the United States Supreme Court struck down Georgia's laws as unconstitutional in Worcester v. Georgia, ruling that only the federal government had power to deal with the Native American tribes, and the states had no power to pass legislation regulating their activities. However, the state ignored the ruling and continued to enforce ...