When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Synoptic Gospels - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synoptic_Gospels

    Double tradition explained entirely by Luke's use of Matthew. Three‑source (Mark–Q/Matthew) A hybrid of Two-source and Farrer. Q may be limited to sayings, may be in Aramaic, and may also be a source for Mark. Wilke (Mark–Luke) Double tradition explained entirely by Matthew's use of Luke. Four-source (Mark–Q/M/L) Matthew and Luke used Q.

  3. Four Evangelists - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Evangelists

    The four winged creatures symbolize, top to bottom, left to right: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Matthew the Evangelist, the author of the first gospel account, is symbolized by a winged man, or angel. Matthew's gospel starts with Joseph's genealogy from Abraham; it represents Jesus's incarnation, and so Christ's human nature. This signifies ...

  4. Gospel of Mark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Mark

    Mark is the only gospel with the combination of verses in Mark 4:24–25: the other gospels split them up, Mark 4:24 being found in Luke 6:38 and Matthew 7:2, Mark 4:25 in Matthew 13:12 and Matthew 25:29, Luke 8:18 and Luke 19:26. The Parable of the Growing Seed. [101] Only Mark counts the possessed swine; there are about two thousand. [102]

  5. Gospel of Matthew - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_Matthew

    Matthew has 600 verses in common with Mark, which is a book of only 661 verses. There is approximately an additional 220 verses shared by Matthew and Luke but not found in Mark, from a second source, a hypothetical collection of sayings to which scholars give the name Quelle ('source' in the German language), or the Q source. [30]

  6. Farrer hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farrer_hypothesis

    However, postulating Luke's acquaintance with the gospel of Matthew overcomes these same problems and gives the source for the common material. The most notable argument for the Farrer hypothesis is that there are many passages where the text of Matthew and Luke agree in making small changes to that of Mark (what is called the double tradition ...

  7. Monarchian Prologues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchian_Prologues

    The prologues provide background on the traditional authors (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) and their theological purposes. [1] [2] Since Luke and John were also credited with the Acts of the Apostles and the Book of Revelation, respectively, information contained in their prologues was eventually spun out into separate prologues to Acts and ...

  8. Gospel harmony - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_harmony

    In the 5th century, Augustine of Hippo wrote extensively on the subject in his book Harmony of the Gospels. [27] Augustine viewed the variations in the gospel accounts in terms of the different focuses of the authors on Jesus: Matthew on royalty, Mark on humanity, Luke on priesthood and John on divinity. [28]

  9. Luke 5 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luke_5

    The story of the calling of the first disciples is also told in Mark 1:16-20 and Matthew 4:18-22, although Matthew's account also includes Andrew, Simon's brother. The story is expanded by Luke, who links it to the miraculous catch of fish. Luke also has already revealed that Jesus had healed Simon's mother-in-law establishing a link between ...