When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. The No Asshole Rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_No_Asshole_Rule

    The No Asshole Rule: Building a Civilized Workplace and Surviving One That Isn't is a book by Stanford professor Robert I. Sutton. He initially wrote an essay [1] for the Harvard Business Review, published in the breakthrough ideas for 2004. Following the essay, he received more than one thousand emails and testimonies.

  3. Friedman doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman_doctrine

    Friedman introduced the theory in a 1970 essay for The New York Times titled "A Friedman Doctrine: The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits". [2] In it, he argued that a company has no social responsibility to the public or society; its only responsibility is to its shareholders. [2]

  4. Business ethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_ethics

    Business ethics operates on the premise, for example, that the ethical operation of a private business is possible—those who dispute that premise, such as libertarian socialists (who contend that "business ethics" is an oxymoron) do so by definition outside of the domain of business ethics proper.

  5. Ethical decision-making - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethical_decision-making

    In business ethics, Ethical decision-making is the study of the process of making decisions that engender trust, and thus indicate responsibility, fairness and caring to an individual. To be ethical, one has to demonstrate respect, and responsibility. [ 1 ]

  6. Ethical dilemma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethical_dilemma

    Two conflicting ethical requirements do not override each other if they have the same strength or if there is no sufficient ethical reason to choose one over the other. [1] [2] [3] Only this type of situation constitutes an ethical dilemma in the strict philosophical sense, often referred to as a genuine ethical dilemma.

  7. Ignorantia juris non excusat - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignorantia_juris_non_excusat

    In law, ignorantia juris non excusat (Latin for "ignorance of the law excuses not"), [1] or ignorantia legis neminem excusat ("ignorance of law excuses no one"), [2] is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely by being unaware of its content.

  8. Organizational ethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizational_ethics

    The function of developing and implementing business ethics in an organization is difficult. Due to each organization's culture and atmosphere being different, there is no clear or specific way to implement a code of ethics in an existing business. Business ethics implementation can be categorized into two groups; formal and informal measures.

  9. Corfield v. Coryell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corfield_v._Coryell

    Corfield v. Coryell; Court: U.S. Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania: Decided: 1823: Holding; New Jersey's law forbidding non-residents from gathering oysters and clams does not violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause or regulate commerce in violation of the Commerce Clause.