When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Qui facit per alium facit per se - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qui_facit_per_alium_facit...

    Qui facit per alium facit per se (anglicised Late Latin), [1] which means "He who acts through another does the act himself", is a fundamental legal maxim of the law of agency. [2] It is a maxim often stated in discussing the liability of employer for the act of employee in terms of vicarious liability."

  3. Vicarious liability in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability_in...

    Vicarious liability in English law is a doctrine of English tort law that imposes strict liability on employers for the wrongdoings of their employees. Generally, an employer will be held liable for any tort committed while an employee is conducting their duties. [ 1 ]

  4. Vicarious liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability

    Vicarious liability is a form of a strict, secondary liability that arises under the common law doctrine of agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability, or duty to control" the activities of a violator.

  5. Viasystems (Tyneside) Ltd v Thermal Transfer (Northern) Ltd

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viasystems_(Tyneside)_Ltd...

    Dual vicarious liability is most unlikely to be a possibility if one of the candidates for such liability is also personally at fault. It would be entirely redundant, if both were. 48. Academic commentary tends to favour the possibility of dual vicarious liability, but feels that authority constrains it.

  6. Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lister_v_Hesley_Hall_Ltd

    Vicarious liability, course of employment, close connection Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd [2001] UKHL 22 is an English tort law case, creating a new precedent for finding where an employer is vicariously liable for the torts of their employees.

  7. Negligent entrustment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligent_entrustment

    The doctrine of vicarious liability provides that an employer is liable for the torts of an employee under an agency theory, even if the employer did nothing wrong; negligent entrustment, however, requires proof of actual negligence on part of the employer before the injury occurred, when the entrustee was entrusted with the dangerous ...

  8. Category:English vicarious liability case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:English_vicarious...

    Pages in category "English vicarious liability case law" The following 8 pages are in this category, out of 8 total. This list may not reflect recent changes .

  9. Contributory copyright infringement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributory_copyright...

    Vicarious liability is another form of secondary liability for copyright infringement through which a person who himself has not directly infringed a copyright can, nevertheless, be held liable. The requirements for attracting vicarious liability under copyright law are: The defendant had the right to control the infringing activity; and