When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Shelley v. Kraemer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelley_v._Kraemer

    One year later, on December 2, 1949, US solicitor general Philip Perlman announced that the "FHA could no longer insure mortgages with restrictive covenants". [13] In 1962, the Equal Opportunity in Housing executive order was signed by President John F. Kennedy , prohibiting using federal funds to support racial discrimination in housing.

  3. Corrigan v. Buckley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corrigan_v._Buckley

    Corrigan v. Buckley, 271 U.S. 323 (1926), was a US Supreme Court case in 1926 that ruled that the racially-restrictive covenant of multiple residents on S Street NW, between 18th Street and New Hampshire Avenue, in Washington, DC, was a legally-binding document that made the selling of a house to a black family a void contract. [1]

  4. Tulk v Moxhay - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulk_v_Moxhay

    After the case, instead of the first narrow privity of estate, any restrictive covenant chiefly needed to satisfy four lesser requirements to bind the successors in title: The covenant must be restrictive . At the date of the covenant, the covenantee owned land that was benefited by the covenant.

  5. What is a restrictive covenant? And how are they used today ...

    www.aol.com/news/restrictive-covenant-used-today...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Q&A: These researchers examined 20 years of data same ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/q-researchers-examined-20-years...

    "If there were negative consequences in the last 20 years of the decision to legalize marriage for same-sex couples, no one has yet been able to measure them," said Benjamin Karney, an adjunct ...

  7. Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davidson_Bros.,_Inc._v._D...

    Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc., 643 A.2d 642 (App. Div. 1994), was a case decided by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey that first applied public policy considerations instead of the touch and concern doctrine when deciding the validity of a restrictive covenant.

  8. Five year statute of limitations to enforce covenant violations

    www.aol.com/news/five-statute-limitations...

    An action to enforce townhome covenants is, in fact, a legal or equitable action on a contract or written instrument—and so any enforcement action must be brought within five years.

  9. Noble v Alley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_v_Alley

    Noble and Wolf v Alley [1951] S.C.R. 64 is a famous Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court struck down a restrictive covenant that restricted ownership of a section of land to "persons of the white or Caucasian race".